Question Number 9
Comments:
“The Township should encourage development of recreational facilities?”
- Not necessary,
can use city facilities, too expensive to build and maintain.
- Recreation
is always needed.
- Single
family housing only.
- Walking
paths are needed. X3
- No
need with all the lakes, ball parks etc. in area.
- In
designated areas.
- To a
limit.
- Not
with a Millage.X2.
- We are
already taxed to death.
- This
brings the lasting residents opportunity to thrive without being ensconced
in their homes like city life.
- Will
provide jobs “without” environmental impact.
- Coordinate
between governmental agencies.
- With
fee consideration for Co. & Twp. Property
owners.
- I
don’t think it’s a priority – maintain what we have.X2
- Bike
paths are needed.X2
- Skating
rinks are needed.
- Use
school properties & designated lots in large developments.
- Not a
top priority for township funds.
- Job
for private enterprise.
- Like
to see the ski & bike trails maintained.
- What
are the designated areas, who designates them & how political are
they?
- Make
use of public recreation.
- What
recreational facilities???
- We
need a facility for both youths & elders.
- Need
racquetball courts & gym.